Let what you learn inform the next decision.
Keep observations, interpretations and open questions available to whoever needs to make the next decision.
Context worth sharing
Sofia records observations from four service visits, Enzo proposes hypotheses, and Clara identifies unanswered questions. Mateus consults their contributions to plan the next study, keeping field observations distinct from proposals that have not yet been tested.
What was observed.
Record relevant evidence and the context in which it was gathered.
How the team interpreted it.
Distinguish observations from interpretations and hypotheses when recording what you learned.
What still needs investigation.
Keep questions and uncertainties available to guide the next steps.
One observation opens new questions.
The next study builds on what we know.
How can I help today?
Illustrative example · Fictional people and records. Each participant uses an authorized connection.
Start for freeA finding doesn't end the research.
It improves the next question.
In this example, the synthesis keeps observations, hypotheses and gaps separate. The team can resume research with its sources and limitations, without treating a proposal as a proven result.
People in this example
Fieldwork, analysis, research and synthesis add different perspectives.
Different AIs
Each person retrieves records in the AI they already use.
Records to consult
Observations, hypotheses and questions remain clearly identified.
Shared collection
The research history helps plan the next investigation.
Less time searching for notes.
More time asking good questions.
Return to the source
Check who recorded an observation and which sample it came from.
Separate hypotheses from evidence
Recover what was observed and what still needs testing.
Choose what to learn next
Use the meeting to prioritize gaps, with the research history already available.